[HTML][HTML] Aerosol cyclosporine prevents acute allograft rejection in experimental lung transplantation

SN Mitruka, SM Pham, A Zeevi, S Li, J Cai… - The Journal of thoracic …, 1998 - Elsevier
SN Mitruka, SM Pham, A Zeevi, S Li, J Cai, GJ Burckart, SA Yousem, RJ Keenan, BP Griffith
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 1998Elsevier
Background: The incidence of acute rejection and the morbidity of systemic cyclosporine
(INN: ciclosporin) after lung transplantation is significant. Experimental evidence suggests
that the allograft locally modulates the immune mechanisms of acute rejection. The purpose
of this study was to determine whether aerosolized cyclosporine would prevent acute
cellular rejection, achieve effective graft concentrations with low systemic drug delivery, and
locally affect production of the inflammatory cytokines involved in acute rejection. Methods …
Background
The incidence of acute rejection and the morbidity of systemic cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) after lung transplantation is significant. Experimental evidence suggests that the allograft locally modulates the immune mechanisms of acute rejection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether aerosolized cyclosporine would prevent acute cellular rejection, achieve effective graft concentrations with low systemic drug delivery, and locally affect production of the inflammatory cytokines involved in acute rejection.
Methods
Unilateral orthotopic left lung transplantation was performed in 64 rats (ACI to Lewis), which were divided into eight groups (each group, n = 8): group A, no treatment; groups B to D, aerosol cyclosporine 1 to 3 mg/kg per day, respectively; groups E to H, systemic cyclosporine 2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg per day, respectively. After the animals were killed on postoperative day 2, 4, or 6, the transplanted lung, native lung, spleen, and blood were collected. Histologic studies, high-pressure liquid chromatography for trough cyclosporine concentrations, and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for cytokine gene expression were performed.
Results
Untreated animals showed grade 4 rejection by postoperative day 6. Aerosol cyclosporine prevented acute rejection in a dose-dependent fashion, with group D animals (3 mg/kg per day) showing minimal grade 1 changes. Among animals receiving systemic cyclosporine, only group H (15 mg/kg per day) controlled (grade 1) rejection. However, aerosol cyclosporine, at an 80% lower dose, achieved significantly lower concentrations of cyclosporine in the graft (12,349 vs 28,714 ng/mg, p = 0.002004) and blood (725 vs 3306 ng/ml, p = 0.000378). Group F (systemic 5 mg/kg per day) had higher cyclosporine concentrations in the blood than group D (p = 0.004572) and similar tissue concentrations (p = 0.115180), yet had grade 2 rejection. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction demonstrated equivalent suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase but a 20- to 25-fold higher expression of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and interferon-γ in group D versus group H recipient allografts.
Conclusion
Local delivery of cyclosporine by aerosol inhalation dose-dependently prevented acute pulmonary allograft rejection. Effective graft levels and low systemic drug delivery required significantly lower doses than systemic therapy alone. The gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines involved in allograft rejection was suppressed by aerosol cyclosporine therapy. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:28-37.)
Elsevier